Lamotte Jean-Luc

Pour élaborer une authentique science de l’homme, il convient, non seulement de se débarrasser de ce qu’il reste des littéraires, mais, aussi, de l’antagonisme du « neuron » (le nerf, qui est du côté du corps) et de la « psuchè » : l’esprit, c’est-à-dire tout le reste, qui est on ne sait où. Autrement dit, ce que je voudrais vous montrer, aujourd’hui, c’est que ces deux écoles de pensée, que sont les neurosciences et la psychanalyse, relèvent d’un dualisme complètement obsolète, en dépit des ...

¿Cuándo empezó el segundo movimiento que presidió al nacimiento de nuestras “ciencias humanas”? En el siglo XIX que fue la época de Balzac y, sobretodo, del Realismo. A partir del movimiento realista, las cosas comenzaron a evolucionar. La literatura se convirtió en una “Literatura de mensaje”. A partir de ese momento, ¿quién hizo, por ejemplo, la sociología? Zola. Es el mensaje tesis, me atrevo a decirlo: novela a tesis, teatro a tesis, escritos por los pensadores

Today I begin with a definition, the one of language as a place of dialectic contradiction of appropriation and language exchange to make it clear, from the outset, the complete change of perspective that we must operate in relation to what I said when I tried to answer the question “What is thinking?” We turn, in fact, analysis of what is in the language of certain cognitive processes (fully implicit) that we have studied, which in it is entirely within sociology, is the permanent contradiction

Teach children to count? You are joking! Any kid of two and a half years, when he says “sleep” or “am stram gram, peak and peak and gram, bourgeois and bourgeois and Ratata, etc.” Is higher in mathematics without even know the tables of multiplication. You will say perhaps: “Well, it seems that the child speaks as Broca’s aphasia?”And you are absolutely right. Some may wonder what it is Broca’s aphasia. Without going into details here, I will answer that Broca’s aphasia is a guy who pushes the

If we want that the question of faith (fundamental question to understand the world as it goes) today it is posed in terms suited to our time, it should be formulated different from the Vatican, theologians and thinkers religious do. Since the disappearance of Jean Gagnepain, there is some of that! In reality, the mutations of scientific knowledge are that we can no longer have the same religious perspective that when it opposed the sciences called from “nature” to the faith, the Aristotelian

The title of my speech should not lead you astray. It would suggest that I support the common opinion that would make freedom of expression to a side, for example, freedom of conscience, freedom of movement, information or something in other words, the word freedom is likely to be used in plural, depending on certain material that could be put behind the concept. This is an absolutely terrible misuse of language, since it confuses, then freedom with its practice, which as you know, is usually

If you agree that concept is part of the sign, you already know that concept could be written. This is something, this is something that I’ve already asked me about; I discussed with you the issue of an ideogram (the figure) and ideogram (ritual). Today I want to quickly complete the analysis I’ve proposed, beginning by telling you a word of what is called the “symbol”.

To develop a genuine science of man, it should be, not only to get rid of literary, but also, to make an antagonism of neuron (the nerve, which is in one side of the body) and the psyche : l spirit, this means all the rest, which we don not know where it is located. In other words, what I would like to show you, today, is that these two schools of thoughts, which are the neurosciences and psychoanalysis, come under a totally and obsolete dualism, despite the many debates that it continues

cette double et réciproque projection d’un axe sur l’autre est le propre de toutes nos énonciations, quelle que soit la langue que nous pratiquons. Il y a toujours, au fond, ce que l’analyse grammaticale et logique nous apprenait, non sans bon sens, à savoir que les éléments d’un énoncé avaient une « nature » - disons une identité (axe vertical) -, et une « fonction » (axe horizontal), c’est-à-dire que ces deux axes contribuent, chacun pour leur part (et il faut ajouter « ensemble »), au fonctio

Quant s’est opéré le second déplacement qui a présidé à la naissance, non plus tant de la psychologie, mais de la sociologie ? Au XIX°, qui fut l’époque de Balzac et, surtout, du Réalisme. A partir du mouvement réaliste, les choses commencent à évoluer. La littérature devient une «Littérature à message ». A partir de ce moment-là, qui a fait, par exemple, de la sociologie ? Zola. C’est le message thèse, si j’ose dire : roman à thèse, théâtre à thèse, écrits par des penseurs...